Families' Distress Regarding Shoreline Degradation Threatening Norfolk Graves
Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Past
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Peril
Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Seeking Answers and Certainty
The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.